Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX B250G GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180511
Uptime	24.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '22 at 21:11
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 117 2-Core 223 73% 134 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 344 42% 322 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	21.4% Poor	Lighting 23.7 Reflection 30 Parallax 28.3 19% 27.3 fps	MRender 27.9 Gravity 33.9 Splatting 31 25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 73 51 92 59 50 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.2% Poor	Read 195 Write 49.1 Mixed 61 SusWrite 62.4 20% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 7.2 38% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 29.5 DQ Mixed 60.4 54% 87 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 122%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 53GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 271 289 165 154 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 291 Write 230 Mixed 240 SusWrite 230 56% 248 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 37.3 92% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 343 262% 355 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 123%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 164GB free Firmware: GS2OA3C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 95 95 95 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	32% Below average	Read 16.2 Write 94.4 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 95.4 42% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 7,485 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 11.9 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 9.6 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	73x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	70x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	137x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	26x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	24x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $301

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16