Asus P7H55-M BR

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M BR (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100705
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '22 at 19:27
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 87.3 1-Core 63 2-Core 112 56% 87.3 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 206 25% 190 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 31.5 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 39.8 26% 34.6 fps	MRender 42.2 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 33.4 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB 5,968 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS1A30Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 189 135 176 123 195 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.2% Average	Read 231 Write 216 Mixed 181 SusWrite 159 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 8.6 63% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 14.1 50% 112 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 90%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100 8,795 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 326GB free Firmware: 2AC101C4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 43.6 Write 5 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 53.5 20% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 233GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 115 119 119 119 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 103 Write 106 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 114 70% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	35.3% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 9.5 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M BR Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M BR

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	12x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	11x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	4x
SSD2SC240G1SA754D117-820 240GBPNYBench 82%, 3,306 samples	3x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	23x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	8x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16