Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4960HQ 314 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 69.1 1-Core 96.2 2-Core 64.7 52% 76.7 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 208 35% 248 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M 13,088 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Apple(106B 0130) 2GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1254 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.22% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 5.3 1% 3.6 fps	MRender 8.4 Gravity 3.6 Splatting 5.8 5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.22% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SM0512F 500GB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: UXM2JA1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 512 513 521 537 544 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 568 Write 555 Mixed 404 SusWrite 521 115% 512 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 25.3 82% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 432 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 265 222% 325 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x 2x8GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	65% Good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 21.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 18 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	66x

SSD
SM0512F 500GBAppleBench 83%, 287 samples	31x
SM0512G PCIe 500GBAppleBench 162%, 1,474 samples	4x
SM0256G PCIe 251GBAppleBench 149%, 1,022 samples	2x

RAM
0x484D54343147533641465238412D50422020 2x8GBUnknownBench 63%, 311 samples	35x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x
0x 2x8GBUnknownBench 66%, 83 samples	14x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16