Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 17:29
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 180
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 491
49% 400 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 221 235 236 236 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62% Good
Read 250
Write 231
Mixed 217
SusWrite 232
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 24.7
97% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 130
113% 168 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 62%
Great: 116%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 100 101 102 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 41.3
Write 42.7
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 99.5
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 67%
SanDisk 8GB
1GB free, PID 5574
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.3 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 14.5
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 4.6
19% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.6% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 27.6
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback