Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 115% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	477% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition (all builds)
Memory	59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220517
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '22 at 12:52
Run Duration	436 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Memory 83.1 1-Core 151 2-Core 278 93% 171 Pts	4-Core 572 8-Core 1,037 96% 804 Pts	64-Core 1,491 92% 1,491 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 4074) CLim: 2167 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 136 Parallax 138 129% 144 fps	MRender 154 Gravity 108 Splatting 103 97% 122 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB 44,185 User benchmarks, average bench 430% 921GB free Firmware: 614900WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 2541 3282 3672 3846 3860 3869 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	502% Outstanding	Read 3,820 Write 3,845 Mixed 3,049 SusWrite 3,512 801% 3,556 MB/s	4K Read 78.7 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 84.2 291% 94.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,489 DQ Write 534 DQ Mixed 654 577% 892 MB/s
Poor: 264% ↑ This bench: 502% Great: 573%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB 44,185 User benchmarks, average bench 430% 842GB free (System drive) Firmware: 614900WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 4224 4259 4086 1913 1864 1819 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	477% Outstanding	Read 3,851 Write 4,207 Mixed 3,179 SusWrite 3,027 803% 3,566 MB/s	4K Read 80.8 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 87.9 305% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 1,507 DQ Write 454 DQ Mixed 675 578% 879 MB/s
Poor: 264% ↑ This bench: 477% Great: 573%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB 44,185 User benchmarks, average bench 430% 898GB free Firmware: 614900WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 3880 3864 3860 3868 3878 3868 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	529% Outstanding	Read 3,885 Write 3,802 Mixed 3,057 SusWrite 3,870 823% 3,653 MB/s	4K Read 77.9 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 85.2 294% 96.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,520 DQ Write 584 DQ Mixed 663 593% 922 MB/s
Poor: 264% ↑ This bench: 529% Great: 573%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 198 196 206 197 198 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 191 Mixed 84 SusWrite 200 121% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.7 199% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 204 200 194 207 198 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 196 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 200 122% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.5 212% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 202 201 196 203 202 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 209 Write 214 Mixed 87 SusWrite 200 130% 178 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.8 214% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 203 186 208 188 206 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 156 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 197 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.6 209% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 182 178 179 183 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 175 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 180 109% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.5 214% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 186 185 184 186 185 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 196 Mixed 87.4 SusWrite 184 117% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.8 238% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 113%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 741GB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 129 128 129 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 120 Write 119 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 129 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 560GB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 122 121 122 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 144 Write 150 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 121 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.2 331% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB 1,159 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 40.7 104% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 29.8 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 40.7 90% 31.4 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Taichi Razer Edition Builds (Compare 297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 191%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 210%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	73x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	66x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	65x

GPU
RX 6900-XTAMD $1,000Bench 195%, 16,057 samples	34x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	33x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	28x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	31x
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TBBench 430%, 44,185 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GBCorsairBench 108%, 1,159 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,347

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16