Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics92.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '17 at 00:51
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 166
2-Core 330
107% 197 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 643
86% 644 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 104%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 120
Parallax 102
97% 113 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 105
Splatting 106
85% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
22GB free
Firmware: 3.1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 456
Write 316
Mixed 345
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 9.09
48% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 9.88
12% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
16GB free
Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 505
Write 195
Mixed 283
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 7.25
109% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 7.68
65% 155 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 85.2
Write 79.1
Mixed 74.6
60% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.34
77% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
133GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 159
Write 123
Mixed 138
106% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.28
92% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81%
Great: 109%
WD 1600BEV External 160GB
108GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 38
Write 40.6
Mixed 6
33% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.27
74% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Mushkin MR[A/B]4U266GHHF8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 32
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 27.4
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 27.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 55.7
72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback