Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H55M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 18:31
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 129
54% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 178
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
MSI(1462 1861) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
5.35% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 2.5
6% 6.43 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 3.3
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.35%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 190 160 158 161 161 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53% Above average
Read 227
Write 218
Mixed 197
SusWrite 167
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 29.8
99% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 34.9
DQ Write 85.3
DQ Mixed 46.1
39% 55.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 53%
Great: 124%
Maxtor 6B200P0 204GB
73GB free
Firmware: BAH41BY0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 27.1
Mixed 23.7
20% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.3
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 34%
WD WD3200JD-22K 320GB
17GB free
Firmware: 08.05J08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 45 46 46 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 45.9
Write 43.3
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 44.3
31% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 36%
WD WD6400AARS-00Y5B1 640GB
206GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.7 9.9 10 10 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 108
Write 9.7
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 9.8
26% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 12
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.3
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H55M-S2H Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $73
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback