HP SG3-320UK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP SG3-320UK  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AAF
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 15:24
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 245
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 80.6
38% 60.2 Pts
4-Core 85
8-Core 82.6
11% 83.8 Pts
64-Core 85.8
5% 85.8 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
HP(103C 2AA9) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.9
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.22%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200619
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 175 121 153 17 24 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.5% Below average
Read 230
Write 206
Mixed 205
SusWrite 113
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 9
56% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 57.7
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 16.6
34% 66.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ST51264BA1339.16FM Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback