| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | Gigabyte H370HD3 |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190314 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 06 '22 at 22:07 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
93.8%
Outstanding
|
91% 163 Pts
|
85% 695 Pts
|
54% 877 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Gigabyte(1458 404E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
140%
Outstanding
|
164% 214 fps
|
121% 152 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 177 171 114 140 44 MB/s
|
72.5%
Very good
|
52% 235 MB/s
|
111% 44.6 MB/s
|
128% 197 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.5%
Good
|
70% 24.4 GB/s
|
54% 19 GB/s
|
61% 65.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,165 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 275x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 208x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 126x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 85x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 75x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 68x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $651 |