Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-RS9
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 20:12
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 82
2-Core 151
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 475
50% 389 Pts
64-Core 617
41% 617 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69%
Great: 76%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 40 50 52 50 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 54.6
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 49.3
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.2% Above average
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 14.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 0" 1280 720
Typical string Builds (Compare 13,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $279Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $470Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $540Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $378Nvidia RTX 3050 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $449SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback