PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C95 |
Motherboard | MSI MAG B550M BAZOOKA (MS-7C95) (all builds) |
Memory | 7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200604 |
Uptime | 5.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 06 '22 at 20:11 |
Run Duration | 203 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
82.1%
Excellent
|
84% 150 Pts
|
81% 647 Pts
|
72% 1,074 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$230
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.1%
Above average
|
51% 42.3 fps
|
54% 64.7 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 316 313 306 298 319 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
76% 342 MB/s
|
167% 63.3 MB/s
|
215% 316 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$43
871GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 161 163 163 162 161 MB/s
|
90.9%
Outstanding
|
99% 135 MB/s
|
146% 1 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
72.4%
Very good
|
74% 26 GB/s
|
63% 21.9 GB/s
|
45% 89.2 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36% | 29% | 56 | 321 | 252 | 60 | 84.6" | 1920 1080 | HDC1000 HDMI MATRIX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $145Bench 81%, 1,068,225 samples | 1,201x |
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $200Bench 94%, 230,901 samples | 1,082x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $299Bench 84%, 779,952 samples | 552x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $541Bench 154%, 418,174 samples | 430x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $289Bench 88%, 593,655 samples | 225x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $222Bench 71%, 373,044 samples | 198x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $829 |