Samsung X120/X170/X171

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 22%
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung X120/X170/X171  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG X120/X170/X171
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100408
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 20:08
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel U7300
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Memory 42.9
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 37.9
24% 34.7 Pts
4-Core 47.9
8-Core 46
6% 47 Pts
64-Core 44.6
3% 44.6 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Sanyo(144D C063)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSX H 320GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ001Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 52 45 50 41 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 23.9
Write 52.1
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 42.8
25% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X120/X170/X171 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung X120/X170/X171

The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $279Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $470Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $541Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $378Nvidia RTX 3050 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $449SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback