PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | Alienware X51 R2 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Alienware 0PGRP5 |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170320 |
Uptime | 2.9 Days |
Run Date | Aug 06 '22 at 17:44 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
50.9%
Above average
|
51% 84.7 Pts
|
27% 213 Pts
|
22% 322 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.8%
Above average
|
56% 70.8 fps
|
55% 67.2 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 359 316 345 362 355 MB/s
|
91.5%
Outstanding
|
78% 347 MB/s
|
126% 46 MB/s
|
185% 292 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Expansion 1TB
799GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 44 46 48 46 MB/s
|
40.6%
Average
|
40% 55.2 MB/s
|
92% 0.57 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD My Passport 260D 5TB
4TB free, PID 260d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 112 114 115 MB/s
|
64.1%
Good
|
142% 106 MB/s
|
274% 3.07 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
49.2%
Average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
36% 12.4 GB/s
|
42% 95.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 60 | 28.9" | 1280 720 | PHL0000 PHILIPS FTV |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $195Bench 76%, 268,103 samples | 1,062x |
Core i7-4770Intel $137Bench 75%, 173,327 samples | 952x |
Core i5-4460Intel $137Bench 70%, 233,039 samples | 453x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,301 samples | 395x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,347,327 samples | 349x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 34%, 418,450 samples | 272x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $335 |