Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 17:44
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 67.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 278
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 1,026
94% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,454
90% 1,454 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 63
Parallax 87.8
53% 72.1 fps
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 46.8
50% 58.6 fps
Poor: 46% Great: 56%
AMD HD 7770
Asus(1043 0429) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.1034.6
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 27.4
16% 22.1 fps
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 13.3
14% 15.7 fps
Poor: 11% Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
784GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1861 1908 1923 1926 1931 1916 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 1,718
Write 2,021
Mixed 1,870
SusWrite 1,911
426% 1,880 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 87.1
290% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,328
DQ Write 1,074
DQ Mixed 1,189
893% 1,197 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 329%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
505GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2247 339 306 290 315 280 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,796
Write 2,345
Mixed 1,947
SusWrite 630
378% 1,680 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 90
302% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 1,093
DQ Mixed 1,206
910% 1,224 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 259%
Great: 365%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 151 155 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 154
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 152
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
594GB free
Firmware: CV13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 118 115 107 117 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 66.6
Write 95.8
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 112
63% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
336GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 36
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 36.8
48% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
168% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 26.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $853
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback