PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asrock B450M Pro4-F (all builds) |
Memory | 8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20200727 |
Uptime | 4.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 06 '22 at 17:29 |
Run Duration | 522 Seconds |
Run User | EST-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
79.8%
Very good
|
82% 145 Pts
|
71% 557 Pts
|
45% 675 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 970-$125
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.7%
Average
|
48% 65 fps
|
51% 61.6 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 242 305 293 317 264 MB/s
|
99.8%
Outstanding
|
90% 403 MB/s
|
155% 59.7 MB/s
|
212% 310 MB/s
|
![]() WD Black 1TB (2010)-$50
57GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 11 11 27 MB/s
|
||||
![]() hp x765w 32GB
7GB free, PID 6d40
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 14 11 10 12 10 MB/s
|
23.6%
Poor
|
35% 27.3 MB/s
|
346% 6.27 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
75.3%
Very good
|
77% 27 GB/s
|
65% 22.9 GB/s
|
47% 84.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
42% | 44% | 45 | 314 | 245 | 60 | 24.1" | 1920 1200 | DELA07A DELL U2412M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $144Bench 81%, 961,699 samples | 2,374x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $156Bench 76%, 790,751 samples | 2,058x |
Ryzen 5 1600AFAMD $250Bench 74%, 88,151 samples | 642x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RX 580AMD $213Bench 55%, 843,727 samples | 835x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $220Bench 71%, 373,044 samples | 817x |
RX 570AMD $170Bench 46%, 415,950 samples | 680x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $439 |