Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$196
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Memory 79.3
1-Core 164
2-Core 326
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 955
103% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,290
87% 1,290 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$289
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 107
Parallax 109
91% 109 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 100
Splatting 92.7
85% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88%
Great: 95%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
256gb PCS 2.5" SSD 256GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0119A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 430 435 426 443 438 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 384
Write 44.9
Mixed 374
SusWrite 430
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 25.7
66% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 36.5
87% 176 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 200 197 198 198 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 168
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 199
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
9GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.8 4.4 4.7 4.5 4.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
8.21% Terrible
Read 37.2
Write 5.3
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 4.7
14% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.21%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K4 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 62: 8R 6G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
62% 38% 47 273 146 100 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
History: Score 35: 3R 4G 8B | Score 62: 8R 6G 4B
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $813
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $269Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $155Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $378Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback