Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3250 4,164 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3250 CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 78.1 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 170 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 236 32% 239 Pts	64-Core 242 15% 242 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 67%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 63 79 47 47 76 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.2% Below average	Read 209 Write 21.4 Mixed 114 SusWrite 77.8 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 11.7 68% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 72.6 DQ Mixed 15.2 22% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 81%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50 10,446 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 10GB free Firmware: AX002F SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 71 72 71 73 70 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 68.4 Write 72.2 Mixed 30 SusWrite 71.7 44% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905584-016.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	452x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	219x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	145x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $287

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16