Apple MacPro2,1

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Apple MacPro2,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Apple Mac-F4208DC8
Memory	10.7 GB free of 14 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070702
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '17 at 22:13
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5355 426 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 61.1 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 60.9 34% 50.8 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 193 19% 157 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3629) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.07% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.31 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.07% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1133 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1242 (B1) Unknown 95 95 21 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 48 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 199 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9685557721	32.4% Below average	Read 125 Write 101 Mixed 84.4 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 11.6 67% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 42.2 DQ Mixed 11.8 16% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 114%
Samsung HD502JI 500GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 305GB free Firmware: 1AA01111 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 5 9227 (03) Spinup time 83 83 5870 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4425 (05) Reallocated sector count 78 78 630 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 15813 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3809 (0D) Soft read error rate 99 6 3681 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1534 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 15286 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 81 59 320012307 (C2) HDA temperature 78 58 370343958 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 2820 (C4) Reallocation count 85 85 630 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 90 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 3 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	21.3% Poor	Read 32.5 Write 41.1 Mixed 13.9 21% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.45 106% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 14GB 9,406 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 5.8 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.4 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MacPro2,1 Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Apple MacPro2,1

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X53651stBench 44%, 504 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51501stBench 40%, 627 samples	14x
CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples	13x

GPU
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	8x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	6x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	5x

SSD
750 EVO 120GBSamsung $35Bench 93%, 20,420 samples	5x
128GB 128GBXraydiskBench 63%, 994 samples	4x
480GB SATA SSD 480GBPNYBench 80%, 729 samples	4x

RAM
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	17x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	10x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16