| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock B365M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200529 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 01 '22 at 19:54 |
| Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
| Run User | BGR-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400-$161
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
|
54%
Above average
|
69% 105 Pts
|
15% 116 Pts
|
7% 113 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
EVGA(3842 2062) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
58%
Above average
|
55% 93.3 fps
|
64% 77.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
91% 407 MB/s
|
110% 38.2 MB/s
|
269% 360 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
187GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 98 66 39 63 83 MB/s
|
59.4%
Above average
|
78% 106 MB/s
|
129% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5734-036.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
38.1%
Below average
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
58% 68.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B365M-HDV Builds (Compare 2,251 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B365M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 814x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 264x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 119x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 168x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 159x |
| RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 146x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $335 |