Performance Results


Gaming 169% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 188% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI (all builds)
Memory	20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200707
Uptime	14.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '22 at 03:01
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 75.2 1-Core 142 2-Core 270 88% 162 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 930 90% 739 Pts	64-Core 2,006 124% 2,006 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% MSI(1462 3892) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	195% Outstanding	Lighting 283 Reflection 250 Parallax 290 231% 274 fps	MRender 313 Gravity 244 Splatting 178 193% 245 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60 9,893 User benchmarks, average bench 274% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 178 179 283 311 338 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 748 Write 423 Mixed 387 SusWrite 278 102% 459 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 38.6 149% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 615 DQ Write 424 DQ Mixed 646 448% 562 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 390%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$132 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1.5TB free Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 334 350 335 322 337 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 426 Write 324 Mixed 297 SusWrite 335 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 35.3 113% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 184 142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 125%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160 8,291 User benchmarks, average bench 359% 86GB free Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,660 Write 2514 Mixed 1,532 428% 1,902 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 63.6 194% 73.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,333 DQ Write 827 DQ Mixed 1046 789% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 207% Great: 500%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4BL.M16FE 2x16GB 874 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.9% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 30.5 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 24 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 116%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	443x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	294x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	226x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	235x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	193x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	137x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,205

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16