Apple MacPro3,1

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 12 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Apple MacPro3,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Apple Mac-F42C88C8
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080229
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '22 at 15:50
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462 772 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 66.1 1-Core 45.1 2-Core 89.9 42% 67 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 348 31% 263 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2062) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.7% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 103 Parallax 108 91% 108 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 101 Splatting 95.4 88% 109 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 412GB free Firmware: M6CR052 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 210 210 213 209 210 MB/s Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.2% Average	Read 225 Write 219 Mixed 203 SusWrite 205 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 16.5 86% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 84.5 DQ Mixed 18.6 25% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 92%
Hitachi HTS543225L9SA00 250GB-$41 1,026 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: FBEOC43C SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 33 33 33 33 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 46.7 Write 55.3 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 31.3 31% 41.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.7% Poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.2 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 4.6 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MacPro3,1 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Apple MacPro3,1

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples	98x
Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	22x
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples	11x
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	28x
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	25x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $388

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16