PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 (all builds) |
Memory | 8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140930 |
Uptime | 1.8 Days |
Run Date | Jul 28 '22 at 17:15 |
Run Duration | 179 Seconds |
Run User | ARG-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
70%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8581) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 58 49 49 51 51 MB/s
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
205GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 108 112 112 112 111 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
|||
37.2%
Below average
|
||||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.2 7.2 7.6 7.7 7.6 MB/s
|
6.35%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
60.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 251x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 223x |
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 212x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 452x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 219x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 145x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $287 |