| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME B250M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170323 |
| Uptime | 6.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 26 '22 at 23:34 |
| Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
| Run User | NOR-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.8%
Good
|
69% 122 Pts
|
44% 329 Pts
|
21% 338 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.5%
Above average
|
56% 69.7 fps
|
54% 65.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
78% 349 MB/s
|
112% 37.8 MB/s
|
172% 257 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
168GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 100 102 101 93 MB/s
|
53.5%
Above average
|
50% 69.1 MB/s
|
149% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
217GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 179 179 176 179 MB/s
|
92.8%
Outstanding
|
82% 114 MB/s
|
376% 2.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.2%
Good
|
70% 24.7 GB/s
|
56% 19.6 GB/s
|
44% 89.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME B250M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,581 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME B250M-PLUS - $100
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 356x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 350x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 266x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 211x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 195x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 161x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $426 |