PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B250M-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170323 |
Uptime | 6.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 26 '22 at 23:04 |
Run Duration | 179 Seconds |
Run User | NOR-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
74.1%
Very good
|
73% 127 Pts
|
47% 351 Pts
|
21% 334 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$140
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.7%
Above average
|
53% 67.1 fps
|
53% 64.5 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
80% 358 MB/s
|
132% 46 MB/s
|
170% 249 MB/s
|
|
![]() |
51.8%
Above average
|
54% 74.8 MB/s
|
45% 0.57 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
217GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 153 153 153 155 MB/s
|
84.9%
Excellent
|
81% 112 MB/s
|
376% 2.8 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$81
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.5%
Very good
|
73% 25.4 GB/s
|
60% 20.9 GB/s
|
58% 69.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
53% | 48% | 31 | 259 | 206 | 144 | 31.5" | 2560 1440 | SAM7088 LC32G5xT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-7700Intel $205Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 306x |
Core i5-7400Intel $160Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 301x |
Core i5-7500Intel $121Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 241x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $100Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 177x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $140Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 175x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 147x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $508 |