Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 154% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 124% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH530
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, , 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190709
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '22 at 00:27
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 128 2-Core 242 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 482 56% 434 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	194% Outstanding	Lighting 282 Reflection 267 Parallax 335 230% 295 fps	MRender 308 Gravity 248 Splatting 180 194% 245 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 225%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2006) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.21% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 9.5 Parallax 8 5% 8.03 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 10.7 8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.21% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB 22,361 User benchmarks, average bench 287% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 42AZS6AC SusWrite @10s intervals: 1407 923 456 145 785 1066 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 1,854 Write 1,757 Mixed 120 SusWrite 797 251% 1,132 MB/s	4K Read 51.8 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 67.3 218% 73.6 MB/s	DQ Read 916 DQ Write 551 DQ Mixed 615 490% 694 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 370%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	80% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 22.2 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 33.2 SC Mixed 25.5 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,057x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,066x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,443x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	397x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,751x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16