Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 10:25
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 167
2-Core 318
99% 187 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 754
81% 642 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 29.8
21% 28 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 21.6
22% 27.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 20%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2257 MHz, MLim: 3640 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.1% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 122
Parallax 116
96% 119 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 94.7
Splatting 87
82% 102 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 1389 156 67 339 286 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,455
Write 995
Mixed 1217
SusWrite 598
238% 1,066 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 65.4
221% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,154
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 871
623% 817 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 198%
Great: 253%
Samsung SSD 860 QVO 1TB
898GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
Read 28.9
Write 25.9
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 30.2
39% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 9
680% 9.07 MB/s
DQ Read 8.3
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 9.2
694% 9.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 22.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 18.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM Builds (Compare 517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $285Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12400F $146Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $346Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $530Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $346SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback