Asus TUF GAMING B560M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560M-E (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '22 at 16:36
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11700K-$270 65,651 User benchmarks, average bench 101% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Memory 94.2 1-Core 175 2-Core 340 110% 203 Pts	4-Core 659 8-Core 1,152 109% 905 Pts	64-Core 1,688 104% 1,688 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 873A) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.47 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.2% Very good	Lighting 91.3 Reflection 92 Parallax 84.9 74% 89.4 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 80.5 Splatting 72.9 71% 88.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 240GB 4,162 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: N200409d SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 410 409 408 415 112 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 395 Mixed 380 SusWrite 362 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 98.3 4K Mixed 46.5 174% 62.1 MB/s	DQ Read 67.9 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 86.2 91% 144 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 191 191 191 192 192 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 158 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 191 98% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
OCPC AM8S3200CL16-B 2x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 43.2 MC Write 41.5 MC Mixed 34.1 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 28.7 SC Write 43.4 SC Mixed 30.9 98% 34.3 GB/s	Latency 59.3 67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-E Builds (Compare 718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 123%

UFO

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 113%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-E

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	111x
Core i5-11400Intel $134Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	97x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	94x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	101x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	88x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	36x

SSD
XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBAdataBench 193%, 12,045 samples	42x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	33x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	27x

RAM
KF3600C17D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 96%, 13,018 samples	40x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $456

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16