PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Huananzhi X99-F8 (all builds) |
Motherboard | HUANANZHI X99-F8 |
Memory | 34.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210511 |
Uptime | 1.6 Days |
Run Date | Jul 20 '22 at 07:07 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
76.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$37
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 494 405 354 381 391 MB/s
|
134%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
688GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 454 418 388 388 389 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
|
53.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples | 137x |
Xeon E5-2680 v4IntelBench 72%, 1,639 samples | 59x |
Xeon E5-2680 v3IntelBench 71%, 1,417 samples | 32x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 41x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 29x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $274 |