Packard EasyNote TS11HR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPackard EasyNote TS11HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50_HR
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 21:39
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B815
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 36.4
2-Core 76.1
37% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 72.8
8-Core 73.9
10% 73.4 Pts
64-Core 75.5
5% 75.5 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0511) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.4
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GN003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 52 63 63 41 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 45
Write 53.2
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 48.7
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TS11HR Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 47%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TS11HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback