Asus Maximus II Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Maximus II Formula (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100415
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '17 at 04:36
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3380 20 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 54.3 2-Core 108 48% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 214 28% 213 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088 6,806 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Nvidia(10DE 1035) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Lighting 59.4 Reflection 56.7 Parallax 72.8 48% 62.9 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 61.5 Splatting 48.8 48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 120GB 3,401 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 332A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 13586075 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 112777251268953 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2269 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 428 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 37 49 81607589925 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13586075 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13586075 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13586075 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13063 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8997 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8997 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23506	41.9% Average	Read 191 Write 110 Mixed 139 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 15.4 74% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 93.7 DQ Mixed 50.3 57% 98.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 81%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 223GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 176 172 4158 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3622 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11692 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2470 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 2189 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1432 (C2) HDA temperature 113 95 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 1 1 65535 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.6% Above average	Read 103 Write 83.7 Mixed 78.4 66% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.38 111% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 9GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	7.7% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 7.11 Mixed 10.7 14% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.84 4K Write 0.74 4K Mixed 0.41 57% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.7% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Maximus II Formula Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Maximus II Formula

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	14x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	10x
Core2 Extreme X9650Intel $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	3x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	3x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $22Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	33x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	8x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $624

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16