Asrock H670 PG Riptide

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H670 PG Riptide (all builds)
Memory	52.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220615
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '22 at 21:26
Run Duration	324 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%
CPU Throttled	95%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700F-$250 19,845 User benchmarks, average bench 109% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 63.8 1-Core 201 2-Core 395 112% 220 Pts	4-Core 767 8-Core 1,397 130% 1082 Pts	64-Core 2,262 140% 2,262 Pts
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 116%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 3170) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.9% Above average	Lighting 68.4 Reflection 77 Parallax 67.1 56% 70.8 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 65.2 Splatting 61.4 53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 441GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1627 1410 1209 1000 874 940 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 2,125 Write 2,412 Mixed 1,575 SusWrite 1,176 410% 1,822 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 52.8 184% 66.7 MB/s	DQ Read 718 DQ Write 380 DQ Mixed 259 270% 452 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 488%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 223GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2061 882 777 785 783 784 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 2,024 Write 1,944 Mixed 1,548 SusWrite 1012 366% 1,632 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 88.7 4K Mixed 61.2 199% 66.2 MB/s	DQ Read 942 DQ Write 411 DQ Mixed 568 450% 640 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 355%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$114 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 676GB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 457 454 474 479 448 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 477 Mixed 435 SusWrite 458 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 37.3 138% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 334 251% 337 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 128%
Intel 540s Series 480GB 4,519 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 214GB free Firmware: LSBG200 SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 118 124 144 156 125 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 457 Write 418 Mixed 370 SusWrite 170 79% 354 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 69.4 4K Mixed 38.1 125% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 232 193% 277 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 95%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free Firmware: DEMA SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 69 69 69 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 68.2 Write 70.7 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 67.9 43% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 65%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB 3,976 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 3.2 3 3.1 2.8 2.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	5.79% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 16.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 2.8 12% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.2 72% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.79% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 5,810 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 24.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 27.3 SC Mixed 23.2 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H670 PG Riptide Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 154%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 144%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock H670 PG Riptide

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel $134Bench 98%, 48,886 samples	65x
Core i7-12700KIntel $228Bench 114%, 78,749 samples	28x
Core i7-12700FIntel $250Bench 109%, 19,845 samples	27x

GPU
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $600Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	23x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	23x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	21x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	18x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $68Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 89%, 87,344 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $896

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16