PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121022 |
Uptime | 1.8 Days |
Run Date | Jul 08 '22 at 14:57 |
Run Duration | 383 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 76% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3060-$274
Asus(1043 8818) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 27 23 23 25 26 MB/s
|
74%
Very good
|
|||
54.8%
Above average
|
||||
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
934GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 119 121 117 121 MB/s
|
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
127GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 23 23 24 MB/s
|
34.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD easystore 2648 2TB
1TB free, PID 2648
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 98 98 100 99 MB/s
|
50.1%
Above average
|
|||
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 23 23 23 24 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD easystore 264D 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 23 23 24 MB/s
|
48%
Average
|
|||
WD easystore 264D 14TB
484GB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 24 23 24 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 23 23 24 MB/s
|
27.5%
Poor
|
|||
WD easystore 264D 16TB
5.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 23 23 25 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
47.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 109x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 62x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 46x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 23x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |