Lenovo 82JU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82JU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 16:11
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 115
2-Core 208
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 731
65% 551 Pts
64-Core 1,212
75% 1,212 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3A81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.6% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 49.5
24% 36.5 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 52
34% 39.2 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G-1101 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21160001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 406 408 406 397 401 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,355
Write 1,614
Mixed 1,013
SusWrite 407
246% 1,097 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 41.8
146% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 474
405% 607 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 154%
Great: 209%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
931GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1608 1820 1953 1957 1978 1909 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 1,968
Write 1,947
Mixed 1,881
SusWrite 1,871
432% 1,917 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 71.5
230% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 721
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 636
476% 636 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 293%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 28.9
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 26.9
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82JU Builds (Compare 5,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Lenovo 82JU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback