Microelectronics G228

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	Microelectronics G228 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock B460M Pro4/ac
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200624
Uptime	13.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '22 at 22:17
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$125 71,804 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Memory 92.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 247 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 752 77% 621 Pts	64-Core 987 61% 987 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 8756) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.8% Very good	Lighting 91.8 Reflection 86.9 Parallax 82.9 75% 87.2 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 78.7 Splatting 71.3 69% 86.6 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 97,624 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 379GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 810 411 324 346 357 328 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	188% Outstanding	Read 1,497 Write 1,306 Mixed 1,139 SusWrite 430 244% 1,093 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 53.4 209% 86 MB/s	DQ Read 1,043 DQ Write 653 DQ Mixed 865 640% 854 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 188% Great: 237%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 183 184 185 185 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 214 Write 178 Mixed 110 SusWrite 183 126% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GKE800UD102408-2666 2x8GB 5,112 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 22.9 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 37.1 SC Mixed 24.9 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G228 Builds (Compare 442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

System: Microelectronics G228

CPU
Core i5-10400Intel $125Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	393x
Core i9-10850KIntel $286Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	16x
Core i7-10700Intel $230Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	246x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	38x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	30x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	237x
WDBA3V5000ANC-WRSN 500GBWDCBench 198%, 3,637 samples	13x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $83Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	10x

RAM
GKE800UD102408-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 5,112 samples	173x
NMUD480E85-2666E 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 481 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $68Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $433

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16