Asus P7P55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55-M  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120904
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 13:35
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 395
44% 344 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 1.2
3% 2.53 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 214 230 230 228 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.8% Good
Read 243
Write 234
Mixed 220
SusWrite 228
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 28.5
98% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 128%
Sandisk 3.2 Gen 1 124GB
106GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.17% Terrible
Read 33.2
Write 28.2
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 27.8
7% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 4.3
17% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 48%
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150
30GB free
Firmware: 20.00K20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 25 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 41.7
Write 31.5
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 27.6
24% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20%
Great: 33%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
740GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 143 147 146 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 135
Write 121
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 142
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55-M Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback