Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 31.2 2-Core 62.3 34% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 124 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 217 221 84 58 66 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.4% Poor	Read 12.5 Write 206 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 135 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 12.8 61% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 76.3 DQ Mixed 22.7 27% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 121GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 91 Write 102 Mixed 48 SusWrite 0.5 44% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	15% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.7 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	10x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	7x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	7x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	11x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	8x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	4x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	5x
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	2x
SP600 128GBAdataBench 73%, 8,600 samples	2x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $123

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16