| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Microelectronics G225 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASRock B360 Pro4 |
| Memory | 8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20190422 |
| Uptime | 10.5 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 02 '22 at 01:01 |
| Run Duration | 338 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
90%
Outstanding
|
86% 153 Pts
|
68% 535 Pts
|
40% 642 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 4527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
|
77.8%
Very good
|
80% 97.1 fps
|
73% 90.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 247 200 229 201 261 MB/s
|
65.8%
Good
|
57% 252 MB/s
|
88% 34.9 MB/s
|
149% 251 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
335GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 351 444 460 431 432 MB/s
|
110%
Outstanding
|
102% 453 MB/s
|
154% 53.3 MB/s
|
263% 351 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown GKE800UD102408-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
73.2%
Very good
|
73% 25.5 GB/s
|
63% 22 GB/s
|
70% 57.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G225 Builds (Compare 117 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Microelectronics G225
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 115x |
| Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 1x |
| Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 92x |
| RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 7x |
| RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 3x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GBWDCBench 93%, 43,498 samples | 53x |
| WDS500G2B0B 500GBWDCBench 96%, 11,733 samples | 21x |
| MX500 2TBCrucial $146Bench 108%, 44,787 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 120% - Outstanding | Total price: $245 |