Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics 10,893 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Memory 35.1 1-Core 34.7 2-Core 65.6 27% 45.1 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 115 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 80CB) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 3.2 2% 2.87 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.5 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-3110A 250GB 216 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30060P00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 148 132 134 148 143 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 335 Write 271 Mixed 241 SusWrite 150 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 16.2 55% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 49.8 DQ Mixed 36 28% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB 9,208 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 6.7 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 226 18% 226 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A6-6310 APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 10,893 samples	21x
E1-6015 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 20%, 1,007 samples	15x
A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 31%, 28,018 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	5x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	4x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 9,805 samples	3x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16