Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 23 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '22 at 13:43
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Memory 67.8 1-Core 58 2-Core 141 52% 89 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 229 24% 194 Pts	64-Core 240 15% 240 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D5) 2GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.1% Poor	Lighting 29 Reflection 28.9 Parallax 31.4 24% 29.8 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 32.6 Splatting 24 25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$32 16,451 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 100 99 92 97 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 132 Write 137 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 91 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 87GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 72 73 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 67.1 Write 63.8 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 71.5 46% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD44G240081 2666 C16 Series 20GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.8% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 18.2 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 10.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	814x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	742x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	772x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	446x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	412x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	258x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	193x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $393

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16