Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 450 8,084 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 52 1-Core 55.2 2-Core 115 43% 74.2 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 149 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 1,871 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1471) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.05% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.87 fps	MRender 0.7 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 0.4 5% 6.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.05% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT07B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 87 115 124 105 91 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.9% Below average	Read 185 Write 129 Mixed 103 SusWrite 106 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 26.4 4K Mixed 14 53% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20.3 DQ Write 53.3 DQ Mixed 16.5 18% 30 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.8% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.4 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 6 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4350ATIBench 1%, 1,871 samples	47x
Mobility Radeon HD 530vATIBench 1%, 250 samples	5x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16