QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	95.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

3 months ago, 1 month ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '22 at 04:04
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 32 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 169 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 569 56% 447 Pts	64-Core 713 48% 713 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,005,992 User benchmarks, average bench 106% MSI(1462 3363) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.3% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 131 Parallax 118 92% 121 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 126 Splatting 112 100% 116 fps
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 115%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 268GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 199 192 150 209 201 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 77%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 629,713 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 280GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 331 345 341 342 342 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 451 Write 448 Mixed 442 SusWrite 340 95% 420 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 30.2 98% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 351 262% 348 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 135%
Red Hat VirtIO 512GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 73GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 1,819 Write 1,777 Mixed 1,836 405% 1,810 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 27.9 4K Mixed 29.2 97% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 416 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 275 216% 303 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$78 155,292 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 194GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 105 107 107 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 170 Write 160 Mixed 86 SusWrite 106 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,850 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 54.9 MC Write 43.2 MC Mixed 47.3 138% 48.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 16.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 1,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900X 12-CoreAMDBench 78%, 493 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 73%, 436 samples	59x
EPYC (with IBPB)AMDBench 69%, 524 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 106%, 1,005,992 samples	88x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $861Bench 137%, 717,838 samples	73x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,387,999 samples	67x

SSD
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	54x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $169Bench 299%, 321,590 samples	30x
Hat VirtIO 120GBRedBench 50%, 44 samples	28x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,850 samples	360x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,339 samples	160x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	130x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $400

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $270	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $446	Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-12400F $160	Nvidia RTX 3050 $292	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $378	Nvidia RTX 3070 $535	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $62	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)