Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJun 30 '22 at 00:41
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 207
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 636
65% 525 Pts
64-Core 807
50% 807 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.4% Above average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 112
Parallax 83.3
49% 85 fps
MRender 82.4
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 73.4
62% 76.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 469 456 325 150 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 410
Write 455
Mixed 391
SusWrite 336
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 41.9
151% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 202
180% 268 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 91%
Kbg40znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
10GB free
Firmware: HP00AE00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,272
Write 1,176
Mixed 1142
267% 1,197 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 70.1
242% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1,023
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 698
568% 814 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 213%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
47GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 29 31 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.1% Poor
Read 41.4
Write 35.7
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 29.7
8% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 14.9
49% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 29.9
DQ Mixed 31.4
24% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 97%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$28
114GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 51 50 51 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 50.8
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 51.5
35% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 46%
Hds722020ala330 RSD HUA 2TB
16GB free
Firmware: JKAOA31D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 30 43 34 40 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 59.9
Write 65.8
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 32.5
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
31GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 9.8 12 9.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.53% Terrible
Read 38.1
Write 32
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 10.9
29% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
49% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.53%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 30.4
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 25.9
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $437
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback