Acer Predator G9-593

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G9-593  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Mustang2_SKS
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 11:28
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 57
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 89.1
40% 65 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 236
25% 200 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2163 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 96.6
236% 96.6 fps
Poor: 48% Great: 82%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW120H6 120GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSBG100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 61 62 65 65 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 374
Write 237
Mixed 284
SusWrite 68.5
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 12.4
59% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 200
148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO1P24HC4R1-BSIS Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.5% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G9-593 Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-593

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback