Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1135G7 36,962 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 72.4 1-Core 147 2-Core 279 89% 166 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 612 68% 534 Pts	64-Core 648 40% 648 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Legend(17AA 5088) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Lighting 20.4 Reflection 25.4 Parallax 24.2 17% 23.3 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ512MEE1OWX 512GB 4,137 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 435GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.2Q0628 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,155 Write 788 Mixed 857 207% 933 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 84.2 4K Mixed 42.1 153% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 629 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 345 288% 424 MB/s
Poor: 121% Great: 210%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 1x16GB 1,421 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 15.3 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 17.9 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 95.9 42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples	9x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	9x

SSD
MZALQ512HALU-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 140%, 2,744 samples	7x
SKHynix_HFM512GD3HX015N 512GBBench 207%, 1,015 samples	1x
RPJTJ512MEE1OWX 512GBUmisBench 172%, 4,137 samples	1x

RAM
RMSA3330MJ78HBF-3200 1x16GBRamaxelBench 49%, 389 samples	4x
HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 1x16GBHynixBench 49%, 1,421 samples	3x
8ATF2G64HZ-3G2E1 1x16GBMicronBench 47%, 697 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16