Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '22 at 07:33
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400 100 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 79.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 237 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 465 62% 467 Pts	64-Core 449 28% 449 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Lighting 42.7 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 39.5 35% 41.3 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 42.4 Splatting 28.1 29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 554 411 424 417 426 425 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 26.2 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 33.4 SC Mixed 23.5 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16