Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '22 at 02:59
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12600K 27 User benchmarks, average bench 93% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Memory 83.1 1-Core 200 2-Core 403 119% 229 Pts	4-Core 772 8-Core 1,305 126% 1,038 Pts	64-Core 1,348 83% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 114%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.3% Very good	Lighting 97.7 Reflection 110 Parallax 100 80% 102 fps	MRender 95.3 Gravity 96.7 Splatting 96.5 79% 96.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 537GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 253GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 338 343 344 358 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 42.8 MC Write 43.2 MC Mixed 40.8 121% 42.3 GB/s	SC Read 28.1 SC Write 48.1 SC Mixed 37.5 108% 37.9 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16