Asus WS X299 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 135% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 148% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	169% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus WS X299 PRO (all builds)
Memory	54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '22 at 18:09
Run Duration	342 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9820X-$550 2,515 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 118 2-Core 182 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 845 72% 621 Pts	64-Core 1635 101% 1635 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% Gigabyte(1458 408F) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.96 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Lighting 252 Reflection 230 Parallax 226 206% 236 fps	MRender 261 Gravity 170 Splatting 137 149% 189 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 170%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,532 Write 7,161 Mixed 6,285 1,491% 6,659 MB/s	4K Read 650 4K Write 284 4K Mixed 340 1,572% 425 MB/s	DQ Read 1,206 DQ Write 834 DQ Mixed 979 742% 1,006 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 335GB free Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1142 1110 1114 1137 1082 1146 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 1,796 Write 1,423 Mixed 842 SusWrite 1,122 289% 1,296 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 53.9 209% 81 MB/s	DQ Read 1103 DQ Write 401 DQ Mixed 441 408% 648 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 365GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 402 389 399 389 414 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 426 Mixed 374 SusWrite 400 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 40.6 144% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 354 267% 359 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 84GB free Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 399 387 391 386 406 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 408 Write 392 Mixed 257 SusWrite 395 82% 363 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 32.6 135% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 314 238% 319 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 106%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB 1,688 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 88 99 102 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 119 Write 45.5 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 93.8 61% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 193% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 443GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 107 107 107 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 161 Write 133 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 108 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GB 141 User benchmarks, average bench 118% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	104% Outstanding	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 54.8 MC Mixed 35.6 119% 41.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 10.7 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WS X299 PRO Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 132%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 166%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 PRO

CPU
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	33x
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	25x
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	25x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	21x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	12x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	10x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	5x
HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GBKingstonBench 104%, 4,320 samples	4x
KHX2666C16/16G Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Corsair CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 KHX2666C16/16G Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 72GBKingstonBench 79%, 4 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,631

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16