MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 18:07
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 208
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 480
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Lighting 74.4
Reflection 66
Parallax 103
61% 81.1 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 87.3
Splatting 53.7
56% 70.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 516 509 542 544 505 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,480
Write 1,634
Mixed 1,307
SusWrite 590
281% 1,253 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 43.6
166% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 783
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 626
470% 634 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 174%
Great: 297%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
75GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 68 40 28 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 352
Write 397
Mixed 382
SusWrite 85.2
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 47
144% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 346
265% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
441GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 97.1
Mixed 70
SusWrite 104
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80
290GB free
Firmware: 0401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 31 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 40.5
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 39.1
28% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 41%
Generic Mass-Storage 125GB
115GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 18.2
Mixed 18.1
SusWrite 18.8
25% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 3
243% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 26.1
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 22.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $732
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback