| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160205 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 27 '22 at 13:34 |
| Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.3%
Average
|
51% 83 Pts
|
22% 168 Pts
|
10% 162 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.40
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
16% 20.5 fps
|
17% 21.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend SSD320 128GB-$92
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 59 56 47 60 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
23% 101 MB/s
|
96% 35 MB/s
|
33% 49.9 MB/s
|
|
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
27GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 59 59 60 60 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
36% 49.3 MB/s
|
161% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.1%
Poor
|
20% 7 GB/s
|
21% 7.47 GB/s
|
36% 110 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 89 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 19x |
| Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 11x |
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 8x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 8x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 41% - Average | Total price: $375 |