Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '22 at 06:35
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 93.4 2-Core 166 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 266 38% 278 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 36A9) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.7 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 64GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,120 Write 1,214 Mixed 2,212 411% 1,849 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 49.6 136% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 522 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 368 287% 400 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	73.1% Very good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 28.1 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 11.8 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16